Black and Deathly

With the onslaught of movies opening in our fair city, the husband and I are trying to ease back into our crazy movie-viewing rhythm. Christmas somehow consumed all of December, so it's been slow going.

Against my better judgment, my husband convinced me that we should just screw it and go see Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows on the Tuesday before Thanksgiving. I had laundry to do, birthdays to shop for, soup to cook - but somehow was swayed to spend at least 2.5 hours at the movies instead. Guess what, people? Totally worth it. I really liked the movie. I even liked that the money-grubbing powers that be decided to split the book into 2 movies. I think this decision will really do this final tale justice. The plot clicked along a little faster than in the book (but that's pretty necessary), but even so it was able to show the fact that Harry, Ron, and Hermione are blossoming adults, yet still awkward kids. These actors have really grown professionally and it's beautiful to see that as well. I was also very impressed with the cinematography - the wilderness scenes really achieve the desolation and isolation that the characters are feeling. They aren't just gorgeous settings in the UK. My favorite scene may have been the one in Godric's Hollow - it looked and felt just how I imagined it when I read it!!! Super eerie, yet weighted with fate and importance. It was kind of like when I saw the first movie and you came upon Hogwarts for the first time. Very exciting. I know one general criticisms of these movies is their disjointed nature for the viewers who have not read the books (like they plot doesn't connect well enough for them to really be stand-alone movies). But my husband hadn't read this book yet and he felt like he could follow it pretty well. I am anxiously awaiting Part 2! I know a few people are holding out on seeing Part 1 until the second part comes out so they don't have to wait for the end (a la The Lord of the Rings). While I understand that viewpoint, I was just too excited to see this one!

Once our 10-day Christmas celebration ended on the 26th, we dropped the dog off at home and raced over to the Arbor to see Black Swan. I was definitely nervous about being disappointed because there has been so much hype. The film is really a slow build, so for the first 30 minutes I was kind of like, "damn, over-hyped." But then, it kind of snuck up on me and I was right there in it. Flawless performances all around and really interesting through and through. It is much more than a dance movie and more than a thriller. It's one of those that you discuss at length with each person you encounter who has seen it as well. There are tons of nooks and crannies and possibilities to explore. And yes, the lesbian scene is pretty hot.

We also attempted to see The King's Speech this week, but it was sold out. Attempt #2 is on Sunday. I'm also hoping to make it out for one more this week - True Grit, The Fighter, 127 Hours, who knows?

"If they invented facebook, they would have invented facebook!"

I was watching Conan last night and Jesse Eisenberg was one of the guests. This reminded me that I never posted a review of The Social Network.

My husband and I saw it at the Alamo Drafthouse Lake Creek about a month ago and I remember really enjoying it start to finish. However, in the days and weeks since, it's been kind of clanging around in my head. But not in an interesting, let's-think-about-it way like Inception, more like it wasn't super-memorable. I've been wondering why. I know you're thinking it was the glass of wine or whatever I had during my dinner-and-a-movie, but my husband and I split a bucket of beer at Inception, and I remember a whole hell of a lot more about that movie.

Seeing Jesse Eisenberg on Conan was a great refresher. Jesse Eisenberg (and Justin Timberlake) is what made the movie so great. The movie, if you don't know, is about the beginning of facebook. How it came together at Harvard at the beginning of the decade and how it almost fell apart upon the business's move to California. Of course, it follows Mark Zuckerberg as well, as the two seem more and more inseparable as the movie rolls on. It's an interesting story of relationships and status (to be honest), and what else is facebook about really?

However, Jesse Eisenberg, though his character (Mark Zuckerberg) is somewhat unassuming, commands your attention throughout the entire movie. He is in such control of himself, his emotions, his speech, that you are really interested by this character/person. After watching it, though, I was kind of like, "yeah, he was good, but isn't he just like that?" He is not - is what I found out on Conan last night. He is awkward, unsure, and self-deprecating. And loves cats (he fosters cats, isn't that so nice?!). He seemed like such a nice guy, but not necessarily at all like the cocky programmer he portrayed on screen. The Oscar buzz for his performance is still strong, so you may want to head out and catch this one if you still can. It also features great support performances from Justin Timberlake (as Sean Parker), Andrew Garfield (the new Spider-Man), and this guy who plays the Winkelvoss twins. It's interesting for anyone who uses facebook, which is everyone (except my mom, thank God). At the very least watch the trailer, which may be one of my favorite trailers of all time.

On a related note, are you watching Conan? I am, and DVR-ing it as well. I really like it and I don't want to let Conan down like I did with the The Tonight Show (I only watched his first and last episodes, but to be fair, I go to bed at the time that show comes on; how my parents watch so much of The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson - I will never understand). I'm ready for the show (so glad Andy Richter is back!) to get into a groove and get some recurring bits, but I'm sticking with it for now (I kind of miss watching Family Guy, though).

Pandora

No, not that Pandora, I already reviewed that one. By the way - did anyone see the "Avatar" re-release? All I ever really heard about it was that they extended the "sex" scene. Meh.

Anyways - I was listening to Pandora (internet radio station you build) at my little desk yesterday. The radio station selected was my Rilo Kiley one with Ben Folds thrown in. So...I'm scanning along in my little hole and "Question" by the Old 97's comes on. I immediately switch back to my browser window so I can click on "Like" as fast as possible - and it's already been selected. Good ear, Pandora.

The thing about this song is - it just makes me feel right. And like everything in the world is right for 2 minutes. As soon as the opening riff started I gasped out loud and just drifted away for a moment to the scene where I imagine this song taking place. It's simple, just guitar and vocals, verse-chorus-verse-chorus, but it packs an emotional, sentimental punch. This song is just perfection.

Here's the chorus (I'll sing it to you any time you like):
Someday somebody's gonna ask you
A question that you should say 'yes' to
Once in your life
Maybe tonight
I've got a question for you

Pair this with the tall drink of water that is Rhett Miller and the way he sways his hips when he plays guitar and I am done.

Other Old 97's faves:
* "Rollerskate Skinny" (my fave)
* "Great Barrier Reef" (my husband's fave)
* "Nineteen"
* "Firefly" (inspiration for my myspace and absolutepunk names - haha! so punk, right?!)

UPDATE - I wandered over to their website after I initially posted this entry and discovered they have a new album coming out on October 12th. Can't wait! Mr. Ken Bethea does a great, quick breakdown on all of the songs on their homepage (and Rhett Miller has a videoblog from the offices of Dunder-Mifflin! That's right, MB, I said it.).

Catfish

My husband and I found ourselves in the luxurious position of having no plans this past Friday night. So...we began discussing possibilities and I mentioned casually maybe we could go to the movies and there's this cool-looking movie showing at the Alamo South Lamar...and my husband exclaimed, "I saw that on News 8 this morning and I want to see it, too!" We are just too adorable like that. Fortunately I bought tickets that afternoon online because it was sold out by the time we got there.

The aforementioned film is a documentary entitled "Catfish." The film reviewer on News 8 posed it as one of the 2 movies about facebook coming out this fall - but it is much more than that. The documentary follows Nev Schulman as he is being filmed by his brother, Rel, and Henry Joost (the 2 filmmakers and Nev share an office space in NYC). They decide to film Nev as he embarks on a relationship that begins on facebook and proceeds to mail, phone, gchat, and eventually a face-to-face meeting. Again, as the reviewer mentioned, this is one of those cases where "truth is stranger than fiction." He even went so far as to say that it's more of a reality-documentary - meaning it's more free-form and less agenda-driven than most documentaries.

My husband and I both enjoyed the film immensely. It unfolds in such a dramatic way and really tries to remain honest while pointing out some obvious flaws in social networking in the internet age. It was also laugh-out-loud funny, shocking in a jaw-dropping sort of way, and emotional. Somehow I felt it all in the span of 90 or so minutes. Kudos to Nev for laying it all out there for us.

There has also been some controversy surrounding "Catfish" - other viewers (famously Morgan Spurlock and Zach Galifianakis) have called its authenticity into question. However, the 3 of them claim that everything happened as it played out on screen - no script, no actors, none of it (unlike "I'm Still Here," Casey Affleck's 'documentary' about Joaquin Phoenix - is anyone going to see that?). I wouldn't suggest seeking out articles on the controversy if you haven't seen the documentary yet as it may spoil the big reveal.

I say - get out and see this one if it shows up near you. I thought about it all weekend and am really glad we were able to see it.

Also - I had one of the specials at Alamo South Lamar at the urging of our waitress. It was spaghetti squash, zucchini, tomato sauce, and parmesan cheese with garlic bread and it was OUT OF THIS WORLD. Check out the specials if you can, is what I learned on Friday.

Re-invigorated?

I stumbled upon an article on msnbc.com last week about the dearth of "Oscar movies" so far this year. While reading the article I felt inspired to make an appearance on my long-neglected blog and regale you, my faithful readers (reader? singular?), with my thoughts. I was so inspired I even made a little trip over to my tried-and-true Oscar-watch blog, "Little Gold Men" on vanityfair.com to uncover some more possibilities for you. Alas - no Oscar bait over there yet. So we'll press onward with this little nugget.

Of the films mentioned - I've seen two. Oops! I need to continue to hang out at the Arbor after the first week in March, I suppose. Instead I (along with my husband and parents) made my way to the 4-screen theater in Bastrop (where my parents live) on a steamy July day to see Toy Story 3. Unfortunately, I missed the beginning of the short because at this particular theater I HAVE to get a refreshment from the concession stand. Why, do you ask? Because they serve Red Flash (Coca-Cola's answer to Big Red - I'll drink either). Anyways, once the children in the theatre settled down and I settled in (and stopped freaking out about the number of children in the theater), the movie swept me away. What a sweet, bittersweet, honest ending to a wonderful franchise. It was appropriate and fun and still had a great message. While I didn't get to see it in 3D (see aforementioned theater), I don't know that that could have made it any better. The article discussed that this may be another Pixar Best Picture contender now that the ban on animated films being nominated in that category has been lifted.

Towards the end of the summer, my husband and I began taking advantage of his summer off and my Friday afternoons off by catching a matinee movie at the Alamo Drafthouse Village. It was a really fun thing to do together. The film that started this date ball rolling was Inception, the psychological thriller by Christopher Nolan. I know the hipster thing to do is bash this movie, but I don't care. I loved it. I loved that my husband and I spent the whole weekend discussing it and turning it over and basically just thinking about it. I loved being able to suspend my disbelief for a few hours to enter Nolan's dreamworld, literally. The acting performances are excellent and include a well-rounded ensemble cast of characters from across the board. I definitely see the blu-ray of this movie sitting on our shelf in the near future.

The other films mentioned were The Kids Are All Right, Restrepo, Exit Through the Gift Shop, Winter's Bone, The Social Network, True Grit (filmed in and around Austin!), and Hereafter. I'll be honest with you, I've only even heard of half of them and I definitely missed The Kids Are All Right in the theaters. I have a feeling we'll get there, though.

Outside of these films, the one we watched most recently was The Ghost Writer. This is a film directed by Roman Polanski starring Ewan McGregor, Pierce Brosnan, Olivia Williams, and Kim Cattrall (and her dreadful British accent). The film is based on a book by Robert Harris and is a thinly veiled criticism of Tony Blair, former British Prime Minister (so thin that I even picked up on it and I know precious little about international politics). It is a stark, muted movie set on the stormy Massachusetts coast and follows a ghost-writer (Ewan McGregor) working on the former British Prime Minister's (Pierce Brosnan) memoirs. As the writer stumbles on his predecessor's (recently deceased under suspicious circumstances) research into the underbelly of this politician's life, he discovers more than he bargains for and begins to fear for his life. It is a very interesting movie, albeit a slow build, but one worth watching. The scuttlebutt is that while some of the performances may get nominations for Academy Awards, no one would dare nominate Polanski or this film in their respective categories due to his recent troubles.

The other movie popping up around Austin with Oscar buzz is one called Get Low. This movie stars Robert Duvall and Bill Murray and involves a crochety old man (Duvall) planning his funeral to be staged before he dies. Some say there's a nomination in it for Duvall. I say, maybe it's time to head out to the Arbor...

Hmm...

Life has greatly slowed down our movie-watching lately. In between gigs for my husband's band and the Olympics, not to mention our regular schedule, our dvd players and movie tickets have been oh-so-lonely.

I don't think we will make it as far along through as many Oscar-nominated films as possible this year for a few reasons. #1 - We have been BUSY (see above)! #2 - It seemed that a smaller volume of the films came out on dvd before the award show. The last 2 years that has really allowed us to get a large chunk of them watched. #3 - If previous award shows and predictions are accurate, we've seen all of the winners. I think this is really what has kept my motivation low. We busted to see all of the Best Picture nominees and those that had already won acting awards, but last year we actually saw EVERY movie nominated for an acting award. This year I bet we've seen 30% or so? So speaking of Best Picture nominees...we finally saw the last one last night...

Netflix sent us A Serious Man at least a week ago. It's been sitting out neglected and alone (although protected from our cats and that is no easy feat). Yes, we're busy, but see my aforementioned statement concerning motivation. I hadn't heard anything that glowing about this film when it was in theatres (and Austin loves the Coen brothers), so I just haven't been too pumped about it (much more pumped about A Single Man - Best Actor nomination for Colin Firth, but alas, that was it's only nomination and down on the list you go).

I wouldn't say I'm pumped about it now after our viewing.

The film opens in turn-of-the-century Eastern Europe on a Jewish couple. This scene is spoken entirely in Yiddish and is a folk tale. FYI - it has nothing to do with the movie and merely "sets the tone," as the Coens put it. I wouldn't say it was as beautifully or lovingly done as the first scene in Inglourious Basterds, but it is neat (looking back) as a stand-alone vignette. This was how it was intended, so now you know (as I didn't) that it is not an integral plot device.

Someone I discussed this film with before I saw it put it this way, this is the Coen Bros.' "religious movie." They grew up Jewish in the Midwest in the '60's and this movie is about a Jewish man/father/husband/brother/professor in the Midwest in the '60's. In one sense, it is a re-telling of Job - but in a way it's not. And that may be what has left me so unsatisfied. Job is studied as a wisdom book in the Old Testament. Job is a most faithful servant of God and through a wager with Lucifer, an angel (widely believed to be the devil), God decides to test Job. God believes that no matter what Lucifer brings upon Job, Job will not turn away from the Lord. So Lucifer does just that. While Job becomes angry, he does not stray or blame God. At the end of the book (spoiler alert!), all of his life and luxuries come back and yay for Job!

While Larry (the focal character) is tested and tested and does not blame Hashem (God), Larry was never really that good in the first place. Not like Job is described to be. He is a physics professor, he owns a house, he has a wife and 2 kids, they go to temple - but there is nothing remarkable about Larry. He can't stand up for himself, he can't help his family. His defense for his troubles is: "I didn't do anything!" And that is precisely the problem - he has never done anything. He has just rolled with life without making a splash or being significant - to anything or anyone. I wish the Coen's would have explored that aspect, but except for the repitition it was left largely unexplored.

This movie definitely has its moments, but I am not sure why it is nominated for Best Picture. The main thing I got from this movie is - the Coens can pretty much make what ever they want at this point. That could be a good thing, but I remember feeling like this after seeing No Country for Old Men. Kind of like, how did we end up here? And where are we going?

Will we see anything else before Oscar night? I don't know. We may have time to grab a movie out over the weekend, or maybe we'll just make time watch Bright Star, the next film on our queue.

Any thoughts for an Oscar night menu?

14 down...

The husband and I made it another double feature night at the Arbor last Friday. Can I just say again how much I LOVE the staff there?!

We started off with "An Education" in the late afternoon. This film stars Carey Mulligan and Peter Sarsgaard and is set in London in the early 1960's. The story follows Jenny, a prep-school student whose whole life is centered around getting into Oxford. The focus doesn't seem to bother Jenny as she looks forward to her time at Oxford as a time to escape her parents and eventually move to Paris and listen to French pop music. Her life is intersected by David (Peter Sarsgaard) a worldly gentleman with a penchant for showing young women the school of life. The movie (with screenplay adapted by Nick Hornby - !!!) is enjoyable and actually much funnier than I thought it would be. Alfred Molina, Olivia Williams, Cara Seymour, Dominic Cooper, Rosamund Pike, and Emma Thompson shine in their supporting roles and Carey Mulligan really treads the line between 16-yr-old schoolgirl and "young woman" very well. I don't think this is Best Picture, but Mulligan and Hornby's contributions are delightful and worthy of accolade.

We then moved on to "Crazy Heart" - Jeff Bridges' tour-de-force as an aging country singer-songwriter. Thank you, director, for opening the movie at a bowling alley - you know we all wanted it, thanks for delivering. Word of warning - this movie is INTENSE! Maybe not "Precious"-intense, but intense in its own way. I knew the film was about the redemption of this man, but I didn't know we were going to follow him all the way down to the bottom, and then lower than that. The music really takes center stage and I think that really added to the authenticity and credibility of the film - not to mention the actors doing their own vocal and instrumental performances. Who would've thought?! The cameos are so outstanding that I won't ruin them for you. Of the two from our double feature - I would recommend this one over "An Education." Can't wait to watch The Dude accept his Oscar. And Ryan Bingham (fellow Austinite!!! or former, at least).

I had Monday off in honor of President's Day, so I decided to catch up with my husband on our Oscar quest (he was 2 ahead of me!). So I headed down to South Austin to catch "The Blind Side" at the AMC at Barton Creek Square Mall. Foolish me forgot about "Percy Jackson & The Lightning Thief" opening this past weekend - I just about had a heart attack standing in line to buy my ticket. No fear upon entering my theatre, just me and old people. Not gonna lie - I really enjoyed this movie. I thought Sandra Bullock was great as a tough, but soft Southern mom and I'm glad this story got told on the big screen. Some critics have branded this film as racist, and I do see that. But at the end of the day, isn't it just about reaching out and helping someone who is down-on-their-luck even though they're not like you? Again - not Best Picture, but a good movie about football and family.

So on Tuesday it was time to catch up on our neglected Netflix and watch "In The Loop" - nominated for Best Original Screenplay. This one is a government satire about miscommunication and power plays eventually leading to declaring war - all in about a week. It involves both British and American politicians and I just don't know if I got it. I would maybe want to watch or discuss it with someone who knows anything about the inner workings of politics (*cough*Will*cough*). It was pretty funny for the first half and then I just got really confused - and kind of ended up not liking any of the characters. Apparently the movie is spun off from a show on the BBC - sadly British humor does not always translate for me. But how awesome was it to see Anna Chlumsky again?!

The future holds "A Serious Man" - coming in our Netflix today. This is the last Best Picture nominee for us to view. Not sure what we'll see in the theatre next - "Nine" has the most nominations of any movie we haven't seen. But "Shutter Island" opens this weekend and I want to see that...who knows...

One fast move or I'm gone...

Life has been moving at breakneck speed in my world as of late, but in the midst of all of it, the husband and I made it out last Wednesday to a show at Antone's. I've only been to Antone's one other time (travesty, right?) and both times I have been impressed at HOW GOOD it sounds in there!!! It really must have the best acoustics of any club downtown. Everything is balanced and clear and not too loud. I really think almost anything (or anyone) can sound good at Antone's. When in Austin, I would recommend catching a show there - I hear they have great blues nights.


So what made us go out on a work night a mere 4 days before my brother's wedding? Ben Gibbard. You would, too. Over the past couple of years Ben (of Death Cab for Cutie and the Postal Service) has been working on a project with Jay Farrar (of Son Volt and Uncle Tupelo). The project was centered around creating a soundtrack for a film version of Jack Kerouac's "Big Sur" called "One Fast Move or I'm Gone." The process started in 2007 and the album came out late last year. Gibbard and Farrar didn't know each other when it all began and Farrar stated in an interview with the Austin American-Statesman that their early sessions really documented their getting-to-know-you process. By the end of it all, about 90% of the material came straight out of the book and an album was born.


The album in and of itself is very interesting because it is less a melding of 2 styles and more an instance of 2 styles co-existing side-by-side. Gibbard's songs are fun, easy pop and Farrar's have a country/blues bent. From what I know about the book/Kerouac, it seems to be an appropriate juxtaposition. The album starts out with the effortless "California Zephyr" (helmed by Gibbard) and ends with the melancholy "San Francisco" (conversely led by Farrar). In a nutshell, this is how Kerouac's trip to Big Sur went and I think the music captures that. If this was a great review, I would have read the book as well, but what can you do.


Willie Johnson (of Centro-Matic) opened and did a respectable job. It was just himself, his guitar, and a looping pedal. I got a little bored, but he was really sincere and had a nice presence. I know I'm old when I have little tolerance for opening acts. Let's just get to the act I paid to see! And so we did...

True to the album, Ben and Jay opened with "California Zephyr" and then ran like a well-oiled machine. They must have used 10 different guitars between the two of them. The hardest-working guy on stage was their guitar tech - he used each song to tune the next guitar and always got the right guitar to the right guy for the right song. The next hardest-working guy was their steel guitar player - he was out-of-control and pretty much the best I've seen/heard. The whole show was fun to see and experience - and I really felt like I was experiencing a unique moment in music, I wouldn't say I feel like that during a lot of the live music I see. Ben Gibbard got to rock a little more than he usually does with Death Cab (fan girl moment: I was like literally 7 feet away from him whenever he sat down at the piano! EEE!!!!!!) and looked like he really enjoyed that opportunity. Watching/listening to Jay Farrar made me want to get into Son Volt and Uncle Tupelo (my friend, Andrew, is out there rolling his eyes - he's been telling me about Son Volt for years). He plays harmonica like a lead guitar soloist - AMAZING. They played the whole album and some other songs that may have been covers, but I didn't know them. Two encores later, it was time to go and it was totally worth staying out past my bedtime.
Buy the cd, see the show, you'll enjoy it.

Would I have seen these otherwise?

This past week or so, the husband and I covered a few more Oscar possibilities via Netflix and the Alamo Drafthouse Village. Let's see what I think...



"District 9" - I am pretty sure there is no way I would have ever chosen to see this movie. It ended up on the list because it was nominated for a Best Original Screenplay award at the Golden Globes. The movie is set in Johannesburg, South Africa (it took me an embarrassingly long amount of time to remember where Johannesburg is) and centers around a 'mother ship' that stalls and hovers over the city. Once agents break in, they discover a race of aliens that are malnourished and proceed to bring them down to Earth and set them up in a tent city deemed "District 9." The aliens, termed 'Prawns' in a derogatory fashion, are unable to leave and as the weeks, months, years progress the tent city slides into a clapboard slum and the Prawns wreak havoc on the human population. Once I figured out the movie was set in South Africa, I found the parallels between the alien treatment and apartheid very fascinating. The cast and crew are all South Africans and of course, the parallels were the point. I was also really fascinated by the idea of inter-planetary diplomacy (has any other alien movie addressed this possibility?) and the natural decision to house and care for these unknown creatures - and then once it becomes permanent there is a slippery slope. I really feel like that is acccurate as far as human nature is concerned. The movie is set up in a documentary style and follows a South African man who is an international agent dealing with District 9. The movie was a bit gruesome, but the writing/concept/acting/action were great. Recommended if you like aliens and stuff like that.



"Avatar" - I mean, I had to see this one, right? Yes yes, we saw it in 3-D. So I really did like the movie. It was entertaining the whole way through and it just looked cool. It was entirely in 3-D - not just for shock value (no snakes striking in your face, Thank God), and I really liked his idea for Pandora and the Na'vi. It should probably win all of the special effects awards. But at the end of the day, this movie is really just "Fern Gully" meets "The Matrix." - my mom threw "Dances With Wolves" in there, too, but I haven't seen that. The story was pretty basic - nothing new there, and the acting wasn't anything special - although the guy who played the main character did a good job. We saw it on Sunday night rather than watching the Golden Globes. The Globes were finishing up when we got home and we saw the last award - Best Picture, Drama. It went to "Avatar." Didn't really agree with that. "Inglourious Basterds" was much better. GO SEE THIS MOVIE RIGHT NOW IN 3-D. It's totally worth the experience. Good movie, just not Best Picture great.



"The Hurt Locker" - I'm still really trying to process this movie. It is about the Iraq war and follows an EOD (Explosive Ordinance Disposal) unit during the last 40 days of their tour in 2004. The movie is a string of their disposal outings as well as a small look at day-to-day life on the base. What really struck me is how accurate that portrayal seemed. My husband's best friend has served two tours in Iraq as a Marine and after his 2nd tour he showed us about 4 rolls of film he took during his time there. It was mostly he and his buddies rough-housing, funny pictures of livestock, and photos of Iraqi citizens he got to know. I think the movie was good and bold and I think it's important to show that war is a drug for some people. Maybe I just didn't get it - but it's all still kind of ruminating up there wondering if I liked it or not. I thought Jeremy Renner was great and I find it very interesting that this movie was directed by a woman. Interesting little tidbit...Kathryn Bigelow (the director of this film) was briefly married to James Cameon. Nuts, right?!


So would I have sought any of these movies out on my own? Probably not - but I did end up enjoying these movies, so - good for me!

Double Feature

This past Friday afternoon my husband surprised me by suggesting we make our evening a double feature. We had already planned on going to the movies, so once he took a look at the times he said, "if we leave now, we can see Up in the Air at 4:10 and then Precious at 7:50." He continued, I'm sure after seeing the stunned look on my face, explaining, "I feel like if I just don't go see Precious now, I'll lose interest and I just won't see it." So off we were, that moment, to the Arbor Movie Theatre.

The Arbor is a Regal Cinema in North Austin that really showcases indie/arthouse movies - maybe even better than the Dobie Theatre on the UT campus. Next to the Alamo Drafthouse, it's my favorite place to see movies in Austin. It's not stadium seating or anything super-special, really, it has maybe 6 screens. But the feel is so laid-back and the staff are SO friendly, that it's a pleasant experience, nonetheless. We find ourselves there particularly often during Oscar-time. Onto the movies...

We started with Up in the Air - all-star top-to-bottom. Directed by Jason Reitman (Thank You For Smoking and Juno), written by him and his father (Ivan), starring George Clooney, Vera Farmiga, Anna Kendrick, and Jason Bateman. Featuring Zack Galifianakis, J.K. Simmons, and Danny McBride. My brother and sister-in-law categorized it as more like Thank You For Smoking than Juno, and they were right. What started out as a satire (in its early stages of writing) became an interesting look on our life in America now - downsizing, obsessions with things and relationships, 'greener' business practices (referred to in the movie as 'glocal' - very clever, I thought). I did like the movie, although it wasn't as hard-hitting as his first 2 movies, but that may be the point. Right now, we're all just kind of up in the air...

If you're looking for hard-hitting, though, look no further than Precious. This movie grabs you by the face from the get-go and doesn't really let go. Some of the situations border on gratuitous, but don't go that far because, unfortunately, it feels believable. The movie runs you ragged with Murphy's Law - everything that can go wrong, does. However, it does end on 50% of a good note. One thing to be discussed is the acting performances. The actresses in this film deserve every accolade they have received. They deliver powerful performances and really become their characters. Like really, you don't think about the fact that Mariah Carey is sitting there playing a social worker - and that is good directing. At the end of the day, though, this may be a little too real for the Academy as it doesn't have the hopefulness of otherwise tragic movies - like last year's Slumdog Millionaire.

What's next? Well, the husband and I will be sitting down to "District 9" this evening and then "The Hurt Locker" is next on our Netflix queue. Our weekend has opened up a little, so maybe we'll make it back out to the cinema again...