This past week or so, the husband and I covered a few more Oscar possibilities via Netflix and the Alamo Drafthouse Village. Let's see what I think...
"District 9" - I am pretty sure there is no way I would have ever chosen to see this movie. It ended up on the list because it was nominated for a Best Original Screenplay award at the Golden Globes. The movie is set in Johannesburg, South Africa (it took me an embarrassingly long amount of time to remember where Johannesburg is) and centers around a 'mother ship' that stalls and hovers over the city. Once agents break in, they discover a race of aliens that are malnourished and proceed to bring them down to Earth and set them up in a tent city deemed "District 9." The aliens, termed 'Prawns' in a derogatory fashion, are unable to leave and as the weeks, months, years progress the tent city slides into a clapboard slum and the Prawns wreak havoc on the human population. Once I figured out the movie was set in South Africa, I found the parallels between the alien treatment and apartheid very fascinating. The cast and crew are all South Africans and of course, the parallels were the point. I was also really fascinated by the idea of inter-planetary diplomacy (has any other alien movie addressed this possibility?) and the natural decision to house and care for these unknown creatures - and then once it becomes permanent there is a slippery slope. I really feel like that is acccurate as far as human nature is concerned. The movie is set up in a documentary style and follows a South African man who is an international agent dealing with District 9. The movie was a bit gruesome, but the writing/concept/acting/action were great. Recommended if you like aliens and stuff like that.
"Avatar" - I mean, I had to see this one, right? Yes yes, we saw it in 3-D. So I really did like the movie. It was entertaining the whole way through and it just looked cool. It was entirely in 3-D - not just for shock value (no snakes striking in your face, Thank God), and I really liked his idea for Pandora and the Na'vi. It should probably win all of the special effects awards. But at the end of the day, this movie is really just "Fern Gully" meets "The Matrix." - my mom threw "Dances With Wolves" in there, too, but I haven't seen that. The story was pretty basic - nothing new there, and the acting wasn't anything special - although the guy who played the main character did a good job. We saw it on Sunday night rather than watching the Golden Globes. The Globes were finishing up when we got home and we saw the last award - Best Picture, Drama. It went to "Avatar." Didn't really agree with that. "Inglourious Basterds" was much better. GO SEE THIS MOVIE RIGHT NOW IN 3-D. It's totally worth the experience. Good movie, just not Best Picture great.
"The Hurt Locker" - I'm still really trying to process this movie. It is about the Iraq war and follows an EOD (Explosive Ordinance Disposal) unit during the last 40 days of their tour in 2004. The movie is a string of their disposal outings as well as a small look at day-to-day life on the base. What really struck me is how accurate that portrayal seemed. My husband's best friend has served two tours in Iraq as a Marine and after his 2nd tour he showed us about 4 rolls of film he took during his time there. It was mostly he and his buddies rough-housing, funny pictures of livestock, and photos of Iraqi citizens he got to know. I think the movie was good and bold and I think it's important to show that war is a drug for some people. Maybe I just didn't get it - but it's all still kind of ruminating up there wondering if I liked it or not. I thought Jeremy Renner was great and I find it very interesting that this movie was directed by a woman. Interesting little tidbit...Kathryn Bigelow (the director of this film) was briefly married to James Cameon. Nuts, right?!
So would I have sought any of these movies out on my own? Probably not - but I did end up enjoying these movies, so - good for me!
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Double Feature
This past Friday afternoon my husband surprised me by suggesting we make our evening a double feature. We had already planned on going to the movies, so once he took a look at the times he said, "if we leave now, we can see Up in the Air at 4:10 and then Precious at 7:50." He continued, I'm sure after seeing the stunned look on my face, explaining, "I feel like if I just don't go see Precious now, I'll lose interest and I just won't see it." So off we were, that moment, to the Arbor Movie Theatre.
The Arbor is a Regal Cinema in North Austin that really showcases indie/arthouse movies - maybe even better than the Dobie Theatre on the UT campus. Next to the Alamo Drafthouse, it's my favorite place to see movies in Austin. It's not stadium seating or anything super-special, really, it has maybe 6 screens. But the feel is so laid-back and the staff are SO friendly, that it's a pleasant experience, nonetheless. We find ourselves there particularly often during Oscar-time. Onto the movies...
We started with Up in the Air - all-star top-to-bottom. Directed by Jason Reitman (Thank You For Smoking and Juno), written by him and his father (Ivan), starring George Clooney, Vera Farmiga, Anna Kendrick, and Jason Bateman. Featuring Zack Galifianakis, J.K. Simmons, and Danny McBride. My brother and sister-in-law categorized it as more like Thank You For Smoking than Juno, and they were right. What started out as a satire (in its early stages of writing) became an interesting look on our life in America now - downsizing, obsessions with things and relationships, 'greener' business practices (referred to in the movie as 'glocal' - very clever, I thought). I did like the movie, although it wasn't as hard-hitting as his first 2 movies, but that may be the point. Right now, we're all just kind of up in the air...
If you're looking for hard-hitting, though, look no further than Precious. This movie grabs you by the face from the get-go and doesn't really let go. Some of the situations border on gratuitous, but don't go that far because, unfortunately, it feels believable. The movie runs you ragged with Murphy's Law - everything that can go wrong, does. However, it does end on 50% of a good note. One thing to be discussed is the acting performances. The actresses in this film deserve every accolade they have received. They deliver powerful performances and really become their characters. Like really, you don't think about the fact that Mariah Carey is sitting there playing a social worker - and that is good directing. At the end of the day, though, this may be a little too real for the Academy as it doesn't have the hopefulness of otherwise tragic movies - like last year's Slumdog Millionaire.
What's next? Well, the husband and I will be sitting down to "District 9" this evening and then "The Hurt Locker" is next on our Netflix queue. Our weekend has opened up a little, so maybe we'll make it back out to the cinema again...
The Arbor is a Regal Cinema in North Austin that really showcases indie/arthouse movies - maybe even better than the Dobie Theatre on the UT campus. Next to the Alamo Drafthouse, it's my favorite place to see movies in Austin. It's not stadium seating or anything super-special, really, it has maybe 6 screens. But the feel is so laid-back and the staff are SO friendly, that it's a pleasant experience, nonetheless. We find ourselves there particularly often during Oscar-time. Onto the movies...
We started with Up in the Air - all-star top-to-bottom. Directed by Jason Reitman (Thank You For Smoking and Juno), written by him and his father (Ivan), starring George Clooney, Vera Farmiga, Anna Kendrick, and Jason Bateman. Featuring Zack Galifianakis, J.K. Simmons, and Danny McBride. My brother and sister-in-law categorized it as more like Thank You For Smoking than Juno, and they were right. What started out as a satire (in its early stages of writing) became an interesting look on our life in America now - downsizing, obsessions with things and relationships, 'greener' business practices (referred to in the movie as 'glocal' - very clever, I thought). I did like the movie, although it wasn't as hard-hitting as his first 2 movies, but that may be the point. Right now, we're all just kind of up in the air...
If you're looking for hard-hitting, though, look no further than Precious. This movie grabs you by the face from the get-go and doesn't really let go. Some of the situations border on gratuitous, but don't go that far because, unfortunately, it feels believable. The movie runs you ragged with Murphy's Law - everything that can go wrong, does. However, it does end on 50% of a good note. One thing to be discussed is the acting performances. The actresses in this film deserve every accolade they have received. They deliver powerful performances and really become their characters. Like really, you don't think about the fact that Mariah Carey is sitting there playing a social worker - and that is good directing. At the end of the day, though, this may be a little too real for the Academy as it doesn't have the hopefulness of otherwise tragic movies - like last year's Slumdog Millionaire.
What's next? Well, the husband and I will be sitting down to "District 9" this evening and then "The Hurt Locker" is next on our Netflix queue. Our weekend has opened up a little, so maybe we'll make it back out to the cinema again...
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Chasing down a Globe...
Over the holiday break or so, I managed to catch 3 films that are nominated for Golden Globes - I would say 2 are easily on the Oscar shortlist. Did you know they aren't announcing Oscar nominations until Groundhog Day?! I'm going to have to do a lot of guessing until then. But without further ado...
"Inglourious Basterds" - This film was best summed-up by my father-in-law: "I don't know what I was expecting, but that wasn't it." And that is in a good way. I suppose I was expecting another World War II movie - but hello - first and foremost this is a Quentin Tarantino movie - and I liked that!! This film is his spaghetti western re-imagining of the end of WWII and was very interesting and evocative and fun and tense, all at the same time. The first scene is artfully and meticulously done - you won't breathe the entire time. The casting was right en pointe - Brad Pitt is delightful and Christoph Waltz (a well-known German actor) is Col. Landa to a smarmy tee. I would say B.J. Novak was under-used as one of the Basterds, but he makes it count when he is on-screen. Of the 3 movies reviewed here, this is the one I would say, "run out and see it right now. NOW." I'm only disappointed that I hadn't seen it before Christmas Day.
"Fantastic Mr. Fox" - I wanted to go to the movies on the day after Christmas with the husband to unwind a little bit and it was so overwhelming because there are just so many movies I want to see right now! We came across "Fantastic Mr. Fox" and realized it was only showing at one theater in town - so we snatched those online tickets right up. As with "Inglourious Basterds" I was expecting an animated, fun kid's movie; but was pleasantly surprised that first and foremost, it was a Wes Anderson movie. Same look, same feel, same cast of characters - it was charming and homey all at the same time. I think Kylie, the opossum was my favorite character. I was also able to enjoy Mrs. Bean's Mulled (non-alcoholic) Apple Cider with my meal. We are so lucky to live in Austin.
"(500) Days of Summer" - Santa brought my husband Netflix for Christmas and last night was our maiden voyage. This movie is nominated for 2 Golden Globes which surprised me because I hadn't heard many good things about it. But still we wanted to see it because we're both suckers for Zooey Deschanel and the hipster-related things. I thought the movie was ok. As it claims at the beginning, it's not a love story, but you just can't help but think of it that way. So you kind of bump along watching this look back at a relationship and break-up and kind of go with it, and then it ends with this total eye-roll moment. I like the idea of the movie in the abstract, but I just think it could have been done much better. I would say no Oscar noms in sight for this one, nor will it win anything from our friends at the Hollywood Foreign Press. Sorry, Zooey and Joseph, you tried.
I don't think I'll be able to get back to my Oscar quest until after the long New Year's weekend. My husband and I will be traveling out-of-state and will probably get to hole up on some family's couch in Birmingham and spend the weekend watching old movies and college football. Sounds perfect to me!!!
"Inglourious Basterds" - This film was best summed-up by my father-in-law: "I don't know what I was expecting, but that wasn't it." And that is in a good way. I suppose I was expecting another World War II movie - but hello - first and foremost this is a Quentin Tarantino movie - and I liked that!! This film is his spaghetti western re-imagining of the end of WWII and was very interesting and evocative and fun and tense, all at the same time. The first scene is artfully and meticulously done - you won't breathe the entire time. The casting was right en pointe - Brad Pitt is delightful and Christoph Waltz (a well-known German actor) is Col. Landa to a smarmy tee. I would say B.J. Novak was under-used as one of the Basterds, but he makes it count when he is on-screen. Of the 3 movies reviewed here, this is the one I would say, "run out and see it right now. NOW." I'm only disappointed that I hadn't seen it before Christmas Day.
"Fantastic Mr. Fox" - I wanted to go to the movies on the day after Christmas with the husband to unwind a little bit and it was so overwhelming because there are just so many movies I want to see right now! We came across "Fantastic Mr. Fox" and realized it was only showing at one theater in town - so we snatched those online tickets right up. As with "Inglourious Basterds" I was expecting an animated, fun kid's movie; but was pleasantly surprised that first and foremost, it was a Wes Anderson movie. Same look, same feel, same cast of characters - it was charming and homey all at the same time. I think Kylie, the opossum was my favorite character. I was also able to enjoy Mrs. Bean's Mulled (non-alcoholic) Apple Cider with my meal. We are so lucky to live in Austin.
"(500) Days of Summer" - Santa brought my husband Netflix for Christmas and last night was our maiden voyage. This movie is nominated for 2 Golden Globes which surprised me because I hadn't heard many good things about it. But still we wanted to see it because we're both suckers for Zooey Deschanel and the hipster-related things. I thought the movie was ok. As it claims at the beginning, it's not a love story, but you just can't help but think of it that way. So you kind of bump along watching this look back at a relationship and break-up and kind of go with it, and then it ends with this total eye-roll moment. I like the idea of the movie in the abstract, but I just think it could have been done much better. I would say no Oscar noms in sight for this one, nor will it win anything from our friends at the Hollywood Foreign Press. Sorry, Zooey and Joseph, you tried.
I don't think I'll be able to get back to my Oscar quest until after the long New Year's weekend. My husband and I will be traveling out-of-state and will probably get to hole up on some family's couch in Birmingham and spend the weekend watching old movies and college football. Sounds perfect to me!!!
Friday, December 4, 2009
The best way to spread Christmas cheer is singing loud for all to hear
Since Thanksgiving I have been indulging in one of my favorite holiday pastimes - listening to Christmas music (thanks, Majic 95.5) nonstop. This love for Christmas music developed some time while I was in college. Probably the long drives home to San Antonio over Christmas break or something. But, the caveat to all of this holiday music is that there is much good as there is bad. Since yesterday, I have mainly been hearing bad. Here are my thoughts...
#1 - Did you know Bryan Adams has a Christmas song? I am not generally opposed to Bryan Adams - I'm definitely a sucker for "Everything I Do (I Do It For You)," but this particular song just sounds like a Bryan Adams song with the word Christmas thrown in the chorus. Who wants to listen to that like it's a special occasion?
#2 - What did "O Holy Night" ever do to you Martina McBride? I know you like to yell and call it singing, but to do an a capella version of this song like you're God's gift to serious Christmas music? I don't think so. Plus Amy Grant has already cornered the market on scoopy-singing Christmas songs.
#3 - In the same vein, Celine Dion and "Happy Christmas (War is Over)" - not so happy. She tries to take the song the serious route, which the song deserves, but relegates the children/Yoko chorus line ("War is over, if you want it, war is over now") to faint background noise. THIS IS A MAJOR PART OF THE MESSAGE OF THE SONG. Don't pretty it up, lady, this song needs to be a little messy.
#4 - If you have to have only one tropical holiday song on your Christmas/Holiday Mix, do yourself a favor and include "Mele Kalikimaka" rather than "Christmas Island." It seemed like lazy writing and didn't have a fun island feel like ol' "Mele" does when Bing sings it. Trust me on this one. Side note - I just googled the song title to get some more info on it - there are no less than FIVE ACTUAL Christmas Islands. Insane. And, of course, Jimmy Buffett recorded the song on his album of the same name. Should have seen that one coming.
I'm sure you're thinking, "Maggie, I thought you said you liked Christmas music..." Yes, yes, we're getting to that. Following is my ultimate Holiday mix with preferred or alternate versions. Maybe a little commentary, too.
* "The Most Wonderful Time of the Year" by Andy Williams - this is a non-negotiable. It must open the mix (and the whole Christmas season, for that matter) and it must only be the Andy Williams version. Amy Grant made a good effort, but doesn't capture the unbridled joy that Andy brings. No order from here on out.
* "Merry Christmas Baby" by Christina Aguilera and Dr. Jon - This bluesy Christmas song is incredible, I actually saw them perform it on Letterman once. It is a great melding of Christina's best, vampy vocal stylings and Dr. Jon's dirty swamp music. You just feel loose all over and ready to get "lit up like a Christmas tree..."
* "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas" by Judy Garland - Christina does a wicked cover of this as well, but in order to infuse some variety, we'll go with classic Judy. Plus her original version captures a little bit of the sadness of it's place in the movie, which I think is appropriate. I'm also a little partial to the way Kelly Osbourne sang it on her family's Christmas special, don't have a recording of it, though.
* "All I Want for Christmas is You" by Mariah Carey - we'll keep on the diva track, although I don't feel the need to explain the need for including this song. It is obviously awesome.
* "I Want a Hippopotamus for Christmas" by Gayla Peevey - "only a hippopotamus will do"
* "Breath of Heaven" by Amy Grant - back in my younger days I used to sing this at church each Christmas Eve.
* "Oi! To the World" by No Doubt - this is actually a cover of a Vandals song, but I'm not really interested in the original. Now No Doubt has a song for all seasons, not that that would stop me in the first place.
* "Father Christmas" by Save Ferris - a little dramatic, but maybe especially poignant this particular holiday season (sample lyric - 'give my daddy a job 'cause he needs one, he's got lots of mouths to feed').
* "Carol of the Meows" by Guster - featured on a Chrismakkuh episode of "The OC" in 2004, this song immediately became a Holiday Mix staple. It is 1.5 minutes of "Carol of the Bells" in meows. By a human. You're welcome.
* "Maybe this Christmas" by Ron Sexsmith
* "Winter Wonderland" by Phantom Planet, my dad likes to sing it the way it was sung on the tv show "Evening Shade" - 'later on we'll prespire' (rather than conspire) and 'walking in my winter underwear.'
* "Blue Christmas" by Bright Eyes - I do like the Elvis version, but you just know Conor Oberst had a blue Christmas at one point and it was bleak. There is also a really pretty rendition of "The First Noel" on this cd that I would maybe include as well.
* "Fairytale of New York" by Pilate - word on the street is the original version of this song by the Pogues is ridiculous, but I've never heard it. If it's better than this one, I would switch it out.
* "I Heard the Bells on Christmas Day" by Pedro the Lion
* "Baby It's Cold Outside" by Zooey Deschanel and Leon Redbone - another great version is done by Kelly Willis and Bruce Robison (sample line, "but Kelly it's cold outside," so cute!), so with that thought...
* "Santa Baby" by Kelly Willis - my mom's favorite version is by Art Alexakis of Everclear, although Eartha Kitt's rendition is nothing to sneeze at either.
* "Merry Christmas from the Family" by Robert Earl Keen - 'CAUSE WE ALL WANT ONE!! This is another non-negotiable.
* "Don't Forget to Feed the Reindeer" by Peggy Lee - on an old Christmas mixtape I remember listening to while riding back and forth to grandparents' houses.
* "Christmas Coming to the USA" from SNL - still a good listen even if you can't see Tracy Morgan dancing.
* "Feliz Navidad" by Jose Feliciano
* "Bizarre Christmas Incident" by Ben Folds
* "If You Were Born Today" by Jimmy Eat World, plus there's "12/23/95," so hard to pick just one Jimmy Eat World song, thus the difficult part of the list...
* "Last Christmas" - honestly my favorite version is the Jimmy one, but the mix already has at least two Jimmy songs...the Wham version is pretty good, it's on Taylor Swift's Christmas cd, what's a girl to do?
* "Christmas (Baby Please Come Home)" - this will be a shocker for those who know me well, but my favorite version of this song is the one done by U2. I know, that's crazy, I hate U2, but it's just good. Great singing, emotion, orchestration, background vocals, all enjoyable. Runners-up - Death Cab for Cutie.
* "Happy Christmas (War Is Over)" - gotta bring it full circle, guys! Best version, hands down, still the original version by John Lennon and Yoko Ono. However, I implore you to give these other versions a listen: Street Drum Corps featuring Bert McCracken from The Used and the cover by the Polyphonic Spree.
Did I miss any of your Christmas favorites?
#1 - Did you know Bryan Adams has a Christmas song? I am not generally opposed to Bryan Adams - I'm definitely a sucker for "Everything I Do (I Do It For You)," but this particular song just sounds like a Bryan Adams song with the word Christmas thrown in the chorus. Who wants to listen to that like it's a special occasion?
#2 - What did "O Holy Night" ever do to you Martina McBride? I know you like to yell and call it singing, but to do an a capella version of this song like you're God's gift to serious Christmas music? I don't think so. Plus Amy Grant has already cornered the market on scoopy-singing Christmas songs.
#3 - In the same vein, Celine Dion and "Happy Christmas (War is Over)" - not so happy. She tries to take the song the serious route, which the song deserves, but relegates the children/Yoko chorus line ("War is over, if you want it, war is over now") to faint background noise. THIS IS A MAJOR PART OF THE MESSAGE OF THE SONG. Don't pretty it up, lady, this song needs to be a little messy.
#4 - If you have to have only one tropical holiday song on your Christmas/Holiday Mix, do yourself a favor and include "Mele Kalikimaka" rather than "Christmas Island." It seemed like lazy writing and didn't have a fun island feel like ol' "Mele" does when Bing sings it. Trust me on this one. Side note - I just googled the song title to get some more info on it - there are no less than FIVE ACTUAL Christmas Islands. Insane. And, of course, Jimmy Buffett recorded the song on his album of the same name. Should have seen that one coming.
I'm sure you're thinking, "Maggie, I thought you said you liked Christmas music..." Yes, yes, we're getting to that. Following is my ultimate Holiday mix with preferred or alternate versions. Maybe a little commentary, too.
* "The Most Wonderful Time of the Year" by Andy Williams - this is a non-negotiable. It must open the mix (and the whole Christmas season, for that matter) and it must only be the Andy Williams version. Amy Grant made a good effort, but doesn't capture the unbridled joy that Andy brings. No order from here on out.
* "Merry Christmas Baby" by Christina Aguilera and Dr. Jon - This bluesy Christmas song is incredible, I actually saw them perform it on Letterman once. It is a great melding of Christina's best, vampy vocal stylings and Dr. Jon's dirty swamp music. You just feel loose all over and ready to get "lit up like a Christmas tree..."
* "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas" by Judy Garland - Christina does a wicked cover of this as well, but in order to infuse some variety, we'll go with classic Judy. Plus her original version captures a little bit of the sadness of it's place in the movie, which I think is appropriate. I'm also a little partial to the way Kelly Osbourne sang it on her family's Christmas special, don't have a recording of it, though.
* "All I Want for Christmas is You" by Mariah Carey - we'll keep on the diva track, although I don't feel the need to explain the need for including this song. It is obviously awesome.
* "I Want a Hippopotamus for Christmas" by Gayla Peevey - "only a hippopotamus will do"
* "Breath of Heaven" by Amy Grant - back in my younger days I used to sing this at church each Christmas Eve.
* "Oi! To the World" by No Doubt - this is actually a cover of a Vandals song, but I'm not really interested in the original. Now No Doubt has a song for all seasons, not that that would stop me in the first place.
* "Father Christmas" by Save Ferris - a little dramatic, but maybe especially poignant this particular holiday season (sample lyric - 'give my daddy a job 'cause he needs one, he's got lots of mouths to feed').
* "Carol of the Meows" by Guster - featured on a Chrismakkuh episode of "The OC" in 2004, this song immediately became a Holiday Mix staple. It is 1.5 minutes of "Carol of the Bells" in meows. By a human. You're welcome.
* "Maybe this Christmas" by Ron Sexsmith
* "Winter Wonderland" by Phantom Planet, my dad likes to sing it the way it was sung on the tv show "Evening Shade" - 'later on we'll prespire' (rather than conspire) and 'walking in my winter underwear.'
* "Blue Christmas" by Bright Eyes - I do like the Elvis version, but you just know Conor Oberst had a blue Christmas at one point and it was bleak. There is also a really pretty rendition of "The First Noel" on this cd that I would maybe include as well.
* "Fairytale of New York" by Pilate - word on the street is the original version of this song by the Pogues is ridiculous, but I've never heard it. If it's better than this one, I would switch it out.
* "I Heard the Bells on Christmas Day" by Pedro the Lion
* "Baby It's Cold Outside" by Zooey Deschanel and Leon Redbone - another great version is done by Kelly Willis and Bruce Robison (sample line, "but Kelly it's cold outside," so cute!), so with that thought...
* "Santa Baby" by Kelly Willis - my mom's favorite version is by Art Alexakis of Everclear, although Eartha Kitt's rendition is nothing to sneeze at either.
* "Merry Christmas from the Family" by Robert Earl Keen - 'CAUSE WE ALL WANT ONE!! This is another non-negotiable.
* "Don't Forget to Feed the Reindeer" by Peggy Lee - on an old Christmas mixtape I remember listening to while riding back and forth to grandparents' houses.
* "Christmas Coming to the USA" from SNL - still a good listen even if you can't see Tracy Morgan dancing.
* "Feliz Navidad" by Jose Feliciano
* "Bizarre Christmas Incident" by Ben Folds
* "If You Were Born Today" by Jimmy Eat World, plus there's "12/23/95," so hard to pick just one Jimmy Eat World song, thus the difficult part of the list...
* "Last Christmas" - honestly my favorite version is the Jimmy one, but the mix already has at least two Jimmy songs...the Wham version is pretty good, it's on Taylor Swift's Christmas cd, what's a girl to do?
* "Christmas (Baby Please Come Home)" - this will be a shocker for those who know me well, but my favorite version of this song is the one done by U2. I know, that's crazy, I hate U2, but it's just good. Great singing, emotion, orchestration, background vocals, all enjoyable. Runners-up - Death Cab for Cutie.
* "Happy Christmas (War Is Over)" - gotta bring it full circle, guys! Best version, hands down, still the original version by John Lennon and Yoko Ono. However, I implore you to give these other versions a listen: Street Drum Corps featuring Bert McCracken from The Used and the cover by the Polyphonic Spree.
Did I miss any of your Christmas favorites?
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Blogging Oscar Hopefuls
I know I kind of dropped the ball on my 'Top Chef' review/recap posts. I discovered quickly that pausing and rewinding and note-taking during my initial viewing of each episode (usually on their first-run-time, which is late for me!) really diminished my enjoyment of the show. My next plan of attack was to save them on the DVR and do a re-watch. Worked better, but ended up being very time-consuming - meaning it was hard to find a 2-hour block in which to do this. I will try to redeem myself for the finale episodes, but don't spoil tonight's because I will not be watching it. My husband is out-of-town for a conference and it's something we watch together. Onward...
My dear readers followed me last year on my 2nd attempt to watch every movie (and short) nominated for an Oscar (the ones they show on tv, not the ones given out 2 days before). I believe I'm committed for a 3rd year, so I thought I'd go ahead and get started and tell you about the ones I've seen. This list is based on predictions made on Vanity Fair's "Little Gold Men" blog - my foremost source on Oscar action. Let us commence!
* "Where the Wild Things Are" (Dark Horse prediction for Best Picture and Best Director, prediction for Best Adapted Screenplay; I would at least add a pick for both Best Original Score and Best Costume) - I may be one of the few who genuinely liked this movie. I was so excited about it as soon as I learned Spike Jonze and Karen O were attached to it and got goosebumps each time I saw the beautiful, emotional trailer featuring "Wake Up" by the Arcade Fire. I liked that the fuzzy line between fantasy and reality is never addressed and leaves the viewer to decide. I know a lot of people thought this movie was too angry for a 'children's movie,' but the whole story is about an angry kid, of course his fantasy (or experience...) are going to reflect that. The monsters were fun and monster-y. I will say that it did drag a bit and felt much longer than it's 90 minutes. Best Picture - no, but Good Picture - yes.
* "The Hangover" (Dark Horse prediction for Best Picture and Best Supporting Actor - Zach Galifianakis) - It's possible "The Hangover" may be the reason for the Best Picture category to now include 10 films. The critical and commercial ($$$) acclaim for this movie was outstanding. I believe the thought is, why shouldn't a fun, funny, raunchy movie be the Best Picture of the year? Everyone freakin' loved it, including myself. I laughed the entire time, even when it got a little ridiculous - and anytime Zach G. can get some attention, I'm there. I don't think it will win Best Picture, but the consideration is well deserved.
* "Public Enemies" (Dark Horse prediction for Best Picture and Best Actor - Johnny Depp) - Has Johnny Depp won an Oscar yet? He should have. Although I wanted this movie to come together a little better, Johnny Depp is sensational and sympathetic as bank robber (and murderer, I suppose) John Dillinger. The ending is a bit anti-climactic and Christian Bale doesn't quite deliver, but it was a fun night at the movies (I remember we were at the Drafthouse and I had their Green Chile Mac & Cheese, highly recommended). Again - a no on Best Picture (I don't think it will be nominated), but I think it's possible Johnny could pull down a statue for this one.
* "Star Trek" (Dark Horse prediction for Best Picture, surely at least effects nominiations) - I actually have never watched the original "Star Trek" series (I was more of a 'Next Generation' sort of girl), but this movie made me want to. This interpretation, set in the future or the past, is fast-paced (but not in a breakneck-I-have-no-idea-what's-going-on type of way) and fun the whole way through. I'm sure it was filled with great bits for Trekkies, but is easily as enjoyable for someone not too familiar with the backstory (myself). The character development and effects were great and I was never bored. This film definitely deserves recognition.
* "Julie & Julia" (prediction for Best Actress - Meryl Streep; Best Supporting Actor - Stanley Tucci; Dark Horse prediction for Best Adapted Screenplay) - I know I'm hearing a collective "duh" out there. Meryl Streep is so hot right now - and you all know it. She shines in this movie and as best I can tell, really captures the natural charm of Julia Child. I found I looked forward to the Julia parts more than the Julie parts while watching and I love Amy Adams, too. I think Stanley Tucci is a stretch for a nomination. He is supporting so far as he plays a very supportive spouse, but I wouldn't say he's particularly special in this role. I like him, so the recognition is exciting. I don't think it will end up with Best Adapted Screenplay - the real magic here was adapting the blog into the book - the movie part is easier after that (I guess except for the incorporation of the Julia Child story...hmm...let me think on this...). For sure Meryl (at least) will get nominated and not having seen any of the other films, I'd give her at least a 50% shot at winning at this point.
* "Up" (prediction for Best Animated Film and Best Original Screenplay) - Total dead lock for Best Animated Film. Like "Wall-E" before it, this movie should be up for Best Picture, hands down. If you didn't see this in 3-D, you missed out, but you should still run out and see it RIGHT NOW. Who would have thought a curmudgeonly Ed Asner and initially irritating scout could capture love so well? I guess the same people who knew we would fall in love with a robot. The colors are gorgeous and the story enveloping. This movie should win all it can.
Well, does seeing 6 count at all? I guess we'll see in the coming weeks when nominations will be announced. Would you like a shortened re-cap of Little Gold Men's other picks? Well, here it is:
LGM legit picks - Hurt Locker, A Serious Man, Up in the Air, The Lovely Bones, Invictus, Precious, Inglorious Basterds, Nine, An Education, Avatar, Crazy Heart, A Single Man, The Last Station, It's Complicated, Whatever Works
LGM Dark Horse picks - Fantastic Mr. Fox, Bright Star, The Informant, Amelia, Brothers, Sherlock Holmes, The Road, Trucker, Broken Embraces, The Stoning of Soraya M., The Messenger, (500) Days of Summer
Happy Watching!
My dear readers followed me last year on my 2nd attempt to watch every movie (and short) nominated for an Oscar (the ones they show on tv, not the ones given out 2 days before). I believe I'm committed for a 3rd year, so I thought I'd go ahead and get started and tell you about the ones I've seen. This list is based on predictions made on Vanity Fair's "Little Gold Men" blog - my foremost source on Oscar action. Let us commence!
* "Where the Wild Things Are" (Dark Horse prediction for Best Picture and Best Director, prediction for Best Adapted Screenplay; I would at least add a pick for both Best Original Score and Best Costume) - I may be one of the few who genuinely liked this movie. I was so excited about it as soon as I learned Spike Jonze and Karen O were attached to it and got goosebumps each time I saw the beautiful, emotional trailer featuring "Wake Up" by the Arcade Fire. I liked that the fuzzy line between fantasy and reality is never addressed and leaves the viewer to decide. I know a lot of people thought this movie was too angry for a 'children's movie,' but the whole story is about an angry kid, of course his fantasy (or experience...) are going to reflect that. The monsters were fun and monster-y. I will say that it did drag a bit and felt much longer than it's 90 minutes. Best Picture - no, but Good Picture - yes.
* "The Hangover" (Dark Horse prediction for Best Picture and Best Supporting Actor - Zach Galifianakis) - It's possible "The Hangover" may be the reason for the Best Picture category to now include 10 films. The critical and commercial ($$$) acclaim for this movie was outstanding. I believe the thought is, why shouldn't a fun, funny, raunchy movie be the Best Picture of the year? Everyone freakin' loved it, including myself. I laughed the entire time, even when it got a little ridiculous - and anytime Zach G. can get some attention, I'm there. I don't think it will win Best Picture, but the consideration is well deserved.
* "Public Enemies" (Dark Horse prediction for Best Picture and Best Actor - Johnny Depp) - Has Johnny Depp won an Oscar yet? He should have. Although I wanted this movie to come together a little better, Johnny Depp is sensational and sympathetic as bank robber (and murderer, I suppose) John Dillinger. The ending is a bit anti-climactic and Christian Bale doesn't quite deliver, but it was a fun night at the movies (I remember we were at the Drafthouse and I had their Green Chile Mac & Cheese, highly recommended). Again - a no on Best Picture (I don't think it will be nominated), but I think it's possible Johnny could pull down a statue for this one.
* "Star Trek" (Dark Horse prediction for Best Picture, surely at least effects nominiations) - I actually have never watched the original "Star Trek" series (I was more of a 'Next Generation' sort of girl), but this movie made me want to. This interpretation, set in the future or the past, is fast-paced (but not in a breakneck-I-have-no-idea-what's-going-on type of way) and fun the whole way through. I'm sure it was filled with great bits for Trekkies, but is easily as enjoyable for someone not too familiar with the backstory (myself). The character development and effects were great and I was never bored. This film definitely deserves recognition.
* "Julie & Julia" (prediction for Best Actress - Meryl Streep; Best Supporting Actor - Stanley Tucci; Dark Horse prediction for Best Adapted Screenplay) - I know I'm hearing a collective "duh" out there. Meryl Streep is so hot right now - and you all know it. She shines in this movie and as best I can tell, really captures the natural charm of Julia Child. I found I looked forward to the Julia parts more than the Julie parts while watching and I love Amy Adams, too. I think Stanley Tucci is a stretch for a nomination. He is supporting so far as he plays a very supportive spouse, but I wouldn't say he's particularly special in this role. I like him, so the recognition is exciting. I don't think it will end up with Best Adapted Screenplay - the real magic here was adapting the blog into the book - the movie part is easier after that (I guess except for the incorporation of the Julia Child story...hmm...let me think on this...). For sure Meryl (at least) will get nominated and not having seen any of the other films, I'd give her at least a 50% shot at winning at this point.
* "Up" (prediction for Best Animated Film and Best Original Screenplay) - Total dead lock for Best Animated Film. Like "Wall-E" before it, this movie should be up for Best Picture, hands down. If you didn't see this in 3-D, you missed out, but you should still run out and see it RIGHT NOW. Who would have thought a curmudgeonly Ed Asner and initially irritating scout could capture love so well? I guess the same people who knew we would fall in love with a robot. The colors are gorgeous and the story enveloping. This movie should win all it can.
Well, does seeing 6 count at all? I guess we'll see in the coming weeks when nominations will be announced. Would you like a shortened re-cap of Little Gold Men's other picks? Well, here it is:
LGM legit picks - Hurt Locker, A Serious Man, Up in the Air, The Lovely Bones, Invictus, Precious, Inglorious Basterds, Nine, An Education, Avatar, Crazy Heart, A Single Man, The Last Station, It's Complicated, Whatever Works
LGM Dark Horse picks - Fantastic Mr. Fox, Bright Star, The Informant, Amelia, Brothers, Sherlock Holmes, The Road, Trucker, Broken Embraces, The Stoning of Soraya M., The Messenger, (500) Days of Summer
Happy Watching!
Friday, September 18, 2009
"I'm a MacGyver when it comes to cooking"
Since this week "Top Chef" brought us to the Southwest for some cooking and camping, I thought Laurine's quote about her upper hand was appropriate. One of the blogs on www.bravotv.com pointed out how nice it was that the show was showcasing more of Las Vegas and Nevada by taking the chef-testants out to the desert. I agree. I was also very glad to see them head out to Nellis Air Force Base a few episodes ago. Incidentally, the only person I know in Nevada is stationed there while serving in the Air Force, so that made it personal for me.
Our Quickfire is pretty cool this week (I mean, they usually are, but you know). It is judged by Padma and Tim Love (of Fort Worth, I hope to go to his restaurant whenever I make it up there) who we remember from 'Top Chef: Masters.' The twist for this Quickfire is the ingredient - chosen by text message vote of 'Top Chef' viewers. Cactus - here we come!!! To be honest with you, I think this is the right choice of the three options, the other two being rattlesnake and kangaroo. To me, meat is meat. But cactus appears to require skill, and so it does. Mike Isabella wins for his raw cactus. He knew how to work with the cactus the best - un-goo it. For the first time, Mike Voltaggio is in the bottom. Crazy!
For the Elimination Challenge, they Highland the chef-testants out to a ranch. They must cook a high-end lunch in very rustic conditions (4 grills on the ground, no refrigeration) for two dozen ranchers. In order to acclimate to their surroundings they camp out on the ranch in tepee's. This provides some funny outside-of-the-competition moments - scaring each other around the campfire, horseshoes, the usual. However, it seemed only half of our chefs were really able to adapt - Jen and Kevin (who were praised, but not put in the top at Judges' Table), Laurine, Ashley, Bryan Voltaggio and Michael Voltaggio. The bottom was rounded out by Robin, Mattin, and Ron.
Bryan won easily with his pork tenderloin on corn polenta with braised dandelions and grilled rutabaga. This being his THIRD elimination win he remarked concerning his brother, "everytime we stand at Judges' Table together I seem to win, so I think he's getting tired of that." Then he laughed and actually smiled - I swear this is the first time I've seen him smile the entire season.
Mattin packed his knives due to the 3 bad ceviches he prepared. One involved cod and Tom actually spit it out (!!) and Tim said it made him sick. Mattin seemed to have no idea how bad his food was, and this was ultimately what sent him home. Robin at least knew her dish was terrible (that is what saved Laurine when Preeti was sent home for their bad pasta salad, if you'll remember) and Ron made a 'disgusting' drink, but was saved by his pretty good ceviche.
I think the frontrunners are still the Voltaggios, Jen, and Kevin - although Mike I. and Ashley are sneaking up there. Robin and Ron's exits are inevitable, they just happened to stave it off this week.
By the numbers!!!
6 - The number of times the M Resort was mentioned or shown this week. This resort was the runaway on product placement this week!!
5 - The number of chef-testants that claimed to be outdoorsy when faced with camping and cooking outside (Robin, Laurine, Mattin, Ashley, and Bryan - coincidental?)
4 - The number of times Mattin mentioned he grew up in the Basque country of France. As Tom Colicchio pointed out on his blog, Mattin kept telling them that he did Basque food, but he never actually made Basque food in the competition. Hmm... Four is also the number of arrogant statements Mike Voltaggio made this week. I mean, I think he can back it up, but let's remember that you were in the bottom on the Quickfire and your brother won the Elimination Challenge.
3 - The next prevalent product, the Toyota Prius, was only mentioned thrice!
Next week's teaser brings in Penn & Teller and the first moment of self-doubt from Jen...
Our Quickfire is pretty cool this week (I mean, they usually are, but you know). It is judged by Padma and Tim Love (of Fort Worth, I hope to go to his restaurant whenever I make it up there) who we remember from 'Top Chef: Masters.' The twist for this Quickfire is the ingredient - chosen by text message vote of 'Top Chef' viewers. Cactus - here we come!!! To be honest with you, I think this is the right choice of the three options, the other two being rattlesnake and kangaroo. To me, meat is meat. But cactus appears to require skill, and so it does. Mike Isabella wins for his raw cactus. He knew how to work with the cactus the best - un-goo it. For the first time, Mike Voltaggio is in the bottom. Crazy!
For the Elimination Challenge, they Highland the chef-testants out to a ranch. They must cook a high-end lunch in very rustic conditions (4 grills on the ground, no refrigeration) for two dozen ranchers. In order to acclimate to their surroundings they camp out on the ranch in tepee's. This provides some funny outside-of-the-competition moments - scaring each other around the campfire, horseshoes, the usual. However, it seemed only half of our chefs were really able to adapt - Jen and Kevin (who were praised, but not put in the top at Judges' Table), Laurine, Ashley, Bryan Voltaggio and Michael Voltaggio. The bottom was rounded out by Robin, Mattin, and Ron.
Bryan won easily with his pork tenderloin on corn polenta with braised dandelions and grilled rutabaga. This being his THIRD elimination win he remarked concerning his brother, "everytime we stand at Judges' Table together I seem to win, so I think he's getting tired of that." Then he laughed and actually smiled - I swear this is the first time I've seen him smile the entire season.
Mattin packed his knives due to the 3 bad ceviches he prepared. One involved cod and Tom actually spit it out (!!) and Tim said it made him sick. Mattin seemed to have no idea how bad his food was, and this was ultimately what sent him home. Robin at least knew her dish was terrible (that is what saved Laurine when Preeti was sent home for their bad pasta salad, if you'll remember) and Ron made a 'disgusting' drink, but was saved by his pretty good ceviche.
I think the frontrunners are still the Voltaggios, Jen, and Kevin - although Mike I. and Ashley are sneaking up there. Robin and Ron's exits are inevitable, they just happened to stave it off this week.
By the numbers!!!
6 - The number of times the M Resort was mentioned or shown this week. This resort was the runaway on product placement this week!!
5 - The number of chef-testants that claimed to be outdoorsy when faced with camping and cooking outside (Robin, Laurine, Mattin, Ashley, and Bryan - coincidental?)
4 - The number of times Mattin mentioned he grew up in the Basque country of France. As Tom Colicchio pointed out on his blog, Mattin kept telling them that he did Basque food, but he never actually made Basque food in the competition. Hmm... Four is also the number of arrogant statements Mike Voltaggio made this week. I mean, I think he can back it up, but let's remember that you were in the bottom on the Quickfire and your brother won the Elimination Challenge.
3 - The next prevalent product, the Toyota Prius, was only mentioned thrice!
Next week's teaser brings in Penn & Teller and the first moment of self-doubt from Jen...
Thursday, August 20, 2009
"I cook how I cook - heart and balls."
I feel like this quote from Hector really speaks to the character of this sixth season of 'Top Chef." The personalities are over-the-top across the board and I am going to assume the food will be as well - I guess that's why they chose Vegas, baby!
I have decided to step away from my previous recap blah blah blah for the sake of infusing this blog with something different. It's supposed to be a review, right? Not a regurgitation. That being said, the recap will remain, but in a more precise and snarky way. I hope you'll stick with me.
This season begins ambitiously with 17 chefs and the beloved mise-en-place (literally "putting in place") relay race. The winning team then moved onto a cook-off using the ingredient they worked with in the relay. Jen C. (who name-dropped Eric Ripert twice) wins $15,000 with her clam ceviche ('seh-veech,' in her words). People are impressed.
The elimination challenge is centered around creating a dish based on each chef's personal vice. What would yours be? Mine would be either reality tv (*ahem*) or some combination of potatoes, pasta, and cheese/cream. Delicious, right? Well, the chefs broke it down like this: 6 of them chose alcohol as a vice (and almost all of them spoke to a specific liquor), 8 chose a personality trait (procrastination and hot temper each coming up more than once - sounds like a great recipe for a reality cooking show...), and disappointingly (to me), only 3 chose food. You're freaking chefs!! But back to the challenge...they remain in their teams from the relay and cook against each other. The winning dish for each group gets judged for the win, and the same idea for the losing dish. Based on screen time and foreboding editing, you knew Kevin and Jen Z. were really going to be in the mix. Jen Z.'s first moment on screen has her declaring that she believes unpacking will bring bad luck...uh, whoops! Then she chooses to stuff her chile relleno (representing her hot temper) with seitan - a wheat gluten product often used as a substitute for meat or protein. I know! As Kevin said, "Nobody f#*@in' likes that stuff. It's yuck." While she thought this 'bold move' would set her apart from the other chefs, it backfires and the judges hate the way she cooks it. I guess bad meat product is worse than overcooked shellfish and chicken or deep-fried steak. Note to self...
On a more exciting note, Kevin wins for his arctic char, though the editors led us to believe that his procrastination vice was going to trip him up. Sounds like it ended up being right on the yummy money. My personal front-runners are Kevin, the brothers, and Jen C. (self-proclaimed 'bitch in the kitchen'). Other bloggers keep talking about someone named Ashley that I can't even remember. All in all, I think we're in for a fun season, even without all of the Las Vegas gimmicks.
Now, the fun part you've all been waiting for...Top Chef by the Numbers!!!
5 - The number of times the M Resort was mentioned (do I smell a Top Chef Destination vacation?! The finale of the first season was also filmed in Vegas.)
4 - The number of ads for both the Glad Family of Products and the Toyota Prius - and Toyota isn't even sponsoring a prize! 4 is also the lucky number of times the producers let Jen Z. warn us that she's going down this episode.
3 - The number of misogynistic comments made by Mike Isabella. Classy.
2 - The number of times Eve let us know how terrible her shellfish dish was going to be. Way to throw us off the scent, guys!
1 - It only took one statement to let the viewers know (but apparently not the cheftestants) that Preeti's team was going to lose the relay race - lose like she's still shucking clams for the first leg while the blue team won. I bet she learns how to shuck a clam stat when she gets home.
I'll leave you with my favorite Wolfgang Puck quote of the evening (did I mention he was the guest judge for the elimination challenge?), outlining his thoughts on purees: "People think you need the steak and you need some baby food with it." He also referred to a dish as looking like 'chicken testicles.' Haha.
I have decided to step away from my previous recap blah blah blah for the sake of infusing this blog with something different. It's supposed to be a review, right? Not a regurgitation. That being said, the recap will remain, but in a more precise and snarky way. I hope you'll stick with me.
This season begins ambitiously with 17 chefs and the beloved mise-en-place (literally "putting in place") relay race. The winning team then moved onto a cook-off using the ingredient they worked with in the relay. Jen C. (who name-dropped Eric Ripert twice) wins $15,000 with her clam ceviche ('seh-veech,' in her words). People are impressed.
The elimination challenge is centered around creating a dish based on each chef's personal vice. What would yours be? Mine would be either reality tv (*ahem*) or some combination of potatoes, pasta, and cheese/cream. Delicious, right? Well, the chefs broke it down like this: 6 of them chose alcohol as a vice (and almost all of them spoke to a specific liquor), 8 chose a personality trait (procrastination and hot temper each coming up more than once - sounds like a great recipe for a reality cooking show...), and disappointingly (to me), only 3 chose food. You're freaking chefs!! But back to the challenge...they remain in their teams from the relay and cook against each other. The winning dish for each group gets judged for the win, and the same idea for the losing dish. Based on screen time and foreboding editing, you knew Kevin and Jen Z. were really going to be in the mix. Jen Z.'s first moment on screen has her declaring that she believes unpacking will bring bad luck...uh, whoops! Then she chooses to stuff her chile relleno (representing her hot temper) with seitan - a wheat gluten product often used as a substitute for meat or protein. I know! As Kevin said, "Nobody f#*@in' likes that stuff. It's yuck." While she thought this 'bold move' would set her apart from the other chefs, it backfires and the judges hate the way she cooks it. I guess bad meat product is worse than overcooked shellfish and chicken or deep-fried steak. Note to self...
On a more exciting note, Kevin wins for his arctic char, though the editors led us to believe that his procrastination vice was going to trip him up. Sounds like it ended up being right on the yummy money. My personal front-runners are Kevin, the brothers, and Jen C. (self-proclaimed 'bitch in the kitchen'). Other bloggers keep talking about someone named Ashley that I can't even remember. All in all, I think we're in for a fun season, even without all of the Las Vegas gimmicks.
Now, the fun part you've all been waiting for...Top Chef by the Numbers!!!
5 - The number of times the M Resort was mentioned (do I smell a Top Chef Destination vacation?! The finale of the first season was also filmed in Vegas.)
4 - The number of ads for both the Glad Family of Products and the Toyota Prius - and Toyota isn't even sponsoring a prize! 4 is also the lucky number of times the producers let Jen Z. warn us that she's going down this episode.
3 - The number of misogynistic comments made by Mike Isabella. Classy.
2 - The number of times Eve let us know how terrible her shellfish dish was going to be. Way to throw us off the scent, guys!
1 - It only took one statement to let the viewers know (but apparently not the cheftestants) that Preeti's team was going to lose the relay race - lose like she's still shucking clams for the first leg while the blue team won. I bet she learns how to shuck a clam stat when she gets home.
I'll leave you with my favorite Wolfgang Puck quote of the evening (did I mention he was the guest judge for the elimination challenge?), outlining his thoughts on purees: "People think you need the steak and you need some baby food with it." He also referred to a dish as looking like 'chicken testicles.' Haha.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)